6. Alternatives on the Market: Our Competitors

Although TECH HY offers a unique combination of project scoring, service infrastructure, investment syndication, and DAO governance, several platforms on the market solve only fragments of the larger problem.

🔥 Main Groups of Competitors:

Launchpads and Crowdfunding Platforms Examples: DAO Maker, Seedify, TrustPad ➔ Primarily focused on fundraising through IDOs/IGOs, but:
- Lack of systemic quality verification of startups.
- No full-service infrastructure to support startup growth.
- High dependency on current market trends and speculative hype.
Accelerators and Venture Studios Examples: Outlier Ventures, Alliance DAO ➔ Focused on startup acceleration, but:
- Extremely selective (acceptance rates around 1–2%).
- Often require substantial equity commitments.
- No scalable token-based service economy.
B2B Marketplaces for Startup Services Examples: FounderPass, StartupStack ➔ Provide service discounts and access, but:
- No integration with quality scoring or verification processes.
- No investment infrastructure or governance model.
KYC and Audit Service Providers Examples: Assure DeFi, Certik (partially) ➔ Focus on KYC and technical security audits, but:
- No holistic business or operational assessment.
- No integrated startup growth support system.

🧠 How TECH HY is Different:

Comprehensive Infrastructure: From project scoring to services, investment support, and DAO governance — all under one unified ecosystem.
Transparency and Public Certification: Public scoring results, open project validations, DAO-based decisions.
Real Token Economy: $VC tokens are required to access real-world services, not just for speculation.
Quality-First Focus: Selective onboarding of projects based on full due diligence — not mass fundraising campaigns.
Bitcoin-Backed Stability: Unique buyback engine fueled by BTC mining operations to create lasting economic security.

TECH HY doesn’t compete in just one niche — we combine the best elements from Launchpads, Accelerators, Service Marketplaces, and Auditors into a complete Web3 Venture Platform.

Previous5. PR & Marketing Strategy Next7. High-Level Concept & USP

Last updated 1 month ago

🔥 Main Groups of Competitors:

Launchpads and Crowdfunding Platforms Examples: DAO Maker, Seedify, TrustPad ➔ Primarily focused on fundraising through IDOs/IGOs, but:

Lack of systemic quality verification of startups.
No full-service infrastructure to support startup growth.
High dependency on current market trends and speculative hype.

Accelerators and Venture Studios Examples: Outlier Ventures, Alliance DAO ➔ Focused on startup acceleration, but:

Extremely selective (acceptance rates around 1–2%).
Often require substantial equity commitments.
No scalable token-based service economy.

B2B Marketplaces for Startup Services Examples: FounderPass, StartupStack ➔ Provide service discounts and access, but:

No integration with quality scoring or verification processes.
No investment infrastructure or governance model.

KYC and Audit Service Providers Examples: Assure DeFi, Certik (partially) ➔ Focus on KYC and technical security audits, but:

No holistic business or operational assessment.
No integrated startup growth support system.

🧠 How TECH HY is Different:

Comprehensive Infrastructure: From project scoring to services, investment support, and DAO governance — all under one unified ecosystem.

Transparency and Public Certification: Public scoring results, open project validations, DAO-based decisions.

Real Token Economy: $VC tokens are required to access real-world services, not just for speculation.

Quality-First Focus: Selective onboarding of projects based on full due diligence — not mass fundraising campaigns.

Bitcoin-Backed Stability: Unique buyback engine fueled by BTC mining operations to create lasting economic security.

TECH HY doesn’t compete in just one niche — we combine the best elements from Launchpads, Accelerators, Service Marketplaces, and Auditors into a complete Web3 Venture Platform.